Philosophy in a New Key a Study in the Symbolism of Reason Rite and Art
Meet a Problem?
Thanks for telling us near the problem.
Friend Reviews
Customs Reviews
Langer wrote this volume long ago, and some of it may be undercut by the latest language research with dolphins and apes, only it is still fascinating. I like how she says that humans volition perform the same fruitless religious rituals for thousands of years, even though they don't reliably work (eastward.g. rain dancing, human sacrifices, etc.) which a true cat or a rat would never persist in. She comments on the claim that symbolizing has a practical genetic advantage. She says the merits is undercut by the crazy symbolizing we do in dreams, when, if it were only practical, we wouldn't do it when we're trying to rest. So she sees our symbolizing as compulsion and not as intention. Again, arguable, since solutions to practical bug have come in dreams (e.k. the concept of the double helix for DNA.)
About a hundred pages into the volume, and and then far she's full-bodied on the difference betwixt signs and sumbols, and the departure betwixt discursive and presentational forms. She takes issue with those who approximate intuition equally a grade of irrational mysticism. She lays merits that intuition is based on the course-making abilities of our senses, so that it is a form of presentational thinking, thought earlier discursive thinking. And how tin thought non be discursive? Considering symbols are not the result of thought, but the very substance of thought. And symbols tin exist presentational (non-exact, not-sequential, but taken in as one Gestalt.)
She quotes Wittgenstein-- "Everything that tin be said can exist said clearly." I wish more poets would recollect along those lines. It gets tiresome with some poets e'er having to play the "what did they really hateful?" game. Sometimes, to me, information technology seems that mediocrity hides behind a pseudo-sophisticated obscurity. Non that I'm not guilty of information technology sometimes myself.
222 pages into the volume. I'm enjoying the chapter On Significance in Music more than than any other and then far, as it covers what makes an expression creative (e.g. why is a Greek vase art and a water bucket just craft?) Langer supports the idea that the distinction is Significant Form. She italicizes this sentence: Sheer cocky-expression requires no creative course. And she claims that art does non limited and so much as information technology represents. Then, when music evokes an emotion, it may not exist because the composer wanted to express an emotion felt at the fourth dimension it was composed, just to represent in a universal manner an emotion the composer was familiar with at some time, maybe years before.
...moreThis work is in two, wide parts. The showtime, greater office distinguishes between signal/sign and symbol. My true cat knows its proper noun equally a sign for attending from its owner. I can now "Albert Einstein" as a symbol for someone I have never even met or seen and all that that entails.
Hinted at by some music notation examples, the 2nd part courageou
"Fault is the toll we pay for progress." This is a quote from Alfred Due north Whitehead that humbly concludes this volume, which has Whitehead as its dedicatee.This piece of work is in ii, broad parts. The first, greater part distinguishes between signal/sign and symbol. My cat knows its name as a sign for attention from its owner. I can now "Albert Einstein" as a symbol for someone I take never fifty-fifty met or seen and all that that entails.
Hinted at by some music annotation examples, the second office courageously attempts to ascertain art and settles on music as the case to build on. Fine art is expression: the ship a symbol makes but without untethered to a linguistic communication.
This work will appeal to students of philosophy, philologists, and aestheticians.
...more"The hugger-mugger of fusion is the fact that the artist's heart sees in nature... an inexhaustible wealth of tension, rhythms, continuities, and contrasts which can be rendered in line and color." Susanne Langer
Hither is my full review: https://bookoblivion.com/2019/10/xiv/s...
Susanne Langer pursues a artistic philosophy that emphasizes artistic observation that we can only hope to emulate."The surreptitious of fusion is the fact that the artist's eye sees in nature... an inexhaustible wealth of tension, rhythms, continuities, and contrasts which can be rendered in line and color." Susanne Langer
Here is my full review: https://bookoblivion.com/2019/10/14/s...
...more thanWhile Langer is trying to raise the alarm about a world crisis that seemingly has aught to do with philosophy, she has her counterparts in the likes of Cassirer and Heidegger in Germany. As an admirer and acolyte of Cassirer's thinking on the importance of symbol-making in intellection, she observes how Cassirer is one of those High german academics who'd been condemned past the new regime. Farther, she knows that Cassirer has tried to appoint with other philosophers and academics to challenge the new anti-intellectualism; in particular, he has challenged the acquiescent Heidegger to acknowledge the intellectual impiety of endorsing the myth and the practices of the Third Reich. There'southward a whole world exterior Philosophy in a New Key that is only subtly alluded to, and Langer maintains a largely dispassionate and academic opinion towards her thesis. That was my chief frustration: in a volume that advocated the re-invigoration of philosophy by incorporation of the irrational into the domain of epistemology, the irrational (symbol, ritual, art) was handled at a clinical remove, dispassionately.
The popularity of existentialism didn't arise until after the war, and its consideration of the irrational was precisely what Langer was seeking. The existentialists, withal, did non tread as softly or reverently in the groves of academe every bit had Langer. It'due south to her credit that she understood the moment so well, fifty-fifty if she lacked the same messy arroyo to philosophy every bit Sartre, Beauvoir, and Camus, all authors of unsettling fictions. The post-WWII motility towards new western philosophical ideals introduced such countercultural phenomena equally the beatniks, alternative (Eastern) philosophies/organized religion (eg, Buddhism), and a new in-the-moment hedonism (can you dig it?). Music reflected this shifting from sometime standards, and jazz, in item, was the siren call to ways of beingness/thinking that repudiated the staid intellectualism of classical and conventional musical idioms. I cite music because Langer herself looked to music as the 1 form of "knowledge" that was by philosophical/epistemological terms uniquely incomprehensible.
Langer'due south book sums upwards all of Western philosophy and notes how it dead-ends with the linguistic analysis of the metaphysical, ie, that which cannot be expressed rationally/discursively. Only the arrival at a positivist/empirical manner of thinking, while it seems to take led to a dead-stop, means only that humanity's original capacity to apply symbol, sign, and ritual has been refined in ane particular way, not that the symbol-making wellspring has been forever close off. In fact, she asserts, it cannot be, and mind and soul tin nevertheless be sustained and inspired past the "errors" of our symbol making. Ultimately, life, language, and philosophy are heuristic, ie, they simply go along by trial and fault to go whatever they get. Information technology doesn't sound like much of a rallying cry, but information technology's realistic, dispassionate, and nigh probable true.
...moreWhat I liked the most is Langer'southward ability to observe everyday examples as evidence for her theories.
The writting style is however very much hard to follow compared to other academic tests. The amount of terms and references is overwhelming for someone not specially literate in philosophy theories.
I think i would appreciate this book more if he or she is a philosophy student. Or as was my case because information technology deals with art and knowledge, a key topic in my PHD enquiry.What I liked the most is Langer's power to discover everyday examples as evidence for her theories.
The writting mode is yet very much hard to follow compared to other academic tests. The amount of terms and references is overwhelming for someone not specially literate in philosophy theories.
...moreRelated Articles
Since he has learned to esteem signs above symbols, to suppress his emotional reactions in favor of applied ones and make apply of nature instead of property and so much of it sacred, he has contradistinct the face, if not the heart, of reality."
Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign yous in to your Goodreads account.
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/421727.Philosophy_in_a_New_Key